Is Juan McCain back?
I’m a little late on coming back to this but wanted to offer my take on the situation.
McCain celebrated Cinco de Mayo with a large Spanish crowd and opened his newly Spanish-language website. Also adding that the he understands if Spanish voters felt discouraged by the language used during the Republican primaries.
From the speech on Cinco, Mayo
“I believe that the majority of Hispanics share our view that the border must be secured, and the border must be secured first,” McCain said. “But they also want us to have an attitude, which I think most Americans do, that these are God’s children and they must be taken care of, or the issue must be addressed, in a humane and compassionate fashion. And I will continue to carry that message with the priority that we must secure our borders first.”
So those who support the rule of law and want those punished who illegally enter our country ahead of those who enter legally are some how “inhumane”?
I’m not in to dividing the GOP’s chances of taking the White House this Fall but I will not support ‘Amnesty’ McCain and will dedicate all my resources to object strongly to any “comprehensive” language that comes from his mouth regarding illegal immigration. This almost feels like the handle is being turned after he firmly planted it last year, especially after months of hearing McCain repeat that he “got the message” and the he “heard” the voters on the issue.
Well, now we’re hearing this,
“The lesson I learned from it is we’ve got to have comprehensive immigration reform.”
Is this an indication that since he is now the inevitable nominee, like it or not, that the old McCain is back?
To further add to this, It certainly doesn’t calm suspicions when he announced that he will speak at the National Council of La Raza (”The Race” or the “Klan with a Tan”) annual convention July 14 in San Diego. McCain better get with the program and fast. This is one issue he can’t afford to go back on.
The Democrats were quicker than most Repulicans to pounce on the double-talk from McCain.
“McCain said he would pursue comprehensive immigration reform as soon as he takes office,” the Democratic National Committee said in a statement. “But in the same news conference, McCain also took the opposite position: saying that the borders have to be secured first….McCain’s double-talk is indicative of a major problem the GOP nominee faces heading to the general election, trying to both appease the Party’s conservative base while trying to reach out to moderate voters and Hispanics who have been targeted with ugly Republican Party attacks on the immigration issue.”





Comment by Jay on 8 May 2008:
Well Jason, you know how I feel about this issue. While I do agree that the border should be handled humanely, I do not think we should grant amnesty. If they could get the process down to become a citizen, a lot of this would go away. Let’s say it took 6 months to grant citizenship for the average immigrant. We could grant them temporary status until they become citizens. While on this temp status, they still have to pay taxes. I don’t think we should get rid of them, but rather, turn them into U.S. citizens, but not through amnesty. And, if you get arrested and you’re not legal, your butt goes back over the border. Jason, I know you don’t agree, so whatdya think?
Comment by Loozianajay on 8 May 2008:
Jay, (Pink)
What you said is basically in play today. And I think most would agree. It’s real simple, we want the borders secure, the existing laws enforced. Those that are trying to become a citizen or just want to work are granted temp status and do pay taxes. That is good for companies, the economy, and our standard of living. That system has been established for a while and has been mostly beneficial. It’s when those who sneak in, absorb generous social welfare benifits, commit crimes, take from the economy, etc.; that’s when people begin to have problems and demand a fix.
Most Americans are not opposed to immigration as most are well aware of their heritages. However, we are no longer “a nation of immigrants” we are a nation of Americans. Centuries worth of generations have made their home here. Sooner or later, we are going to have to stop with the whole “nation of immigrants” argument. It just doesn’t hold water in light of our times.
I’m not that far removed from your school of thought, you just are little more “willing,” I should say. I’m more of END illegal immigration and all enablers, too. I think that is our only ‘big’ difference.
Good comment by the way.