When people who demand tolerance are intolerant

Love makes you do strange things… When a gay couple is denied a marriage ceremony on religious grounds - a pavilion in this case– by a Methodist church, they do what any hypocritical intolerant belligerent does, they sue, bully and threaten.  

The pavilion in question is an open-air building with long benches looking out to the Atlantic Ocean. It is owned by the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association.

“A building very similar to this has been on this site since the late 1800s,” says the Rev. Scott Hoffman, the group’s administrator.

During the summers, Hoffman says, the pavilion is used for Bible studies, church services, gospel choir performances and, in the past at least, weddings. Heterosexual weddings.

When Bernstein and Paster asked to celebrate their civil union in the pavilion, the Methodist organization said they could marry on the boardwalk — anywhere but buildings used for religious purposes. In other words, not the pavilion. Hoffman says there was a theological principle at stake.

“The principle was a strongly held religious belief that a marriage is between a man and a woman,” Hoffman says. “We’re not casting any aspersions or making any judgments. It’s just, that’s where we stand, and we’ve always stood that way, and that’s why we said no.”

The refusal came as a shock to Bernstein, who says Ocean Grove has been revived by the gay community.

“We were crushed,” she says. “I lived my whole live, fortunately, without having any overt prejudices or discrimination waged against me. So while I knew it was wrong, I never knew how it felt. And after this, I did know how that felt. It was extremely painful.”

Luisa says that initially, they walked away from the situation. “We were so stunned, we didn’t know what to do. But as we came out of our initial shocked stage, we began to get a little angry. We felt an injustice had been done,” she says.

So the couple filed a complaint with New Jersey’s Division of Civil Rights, alleging the Methodists unlawfully discriminated against them based on sexual orientation. Attorney Lawrence Lustberg represents them.

“Our law against discrimination does not allow [the group] to use those personal preferences, no matter how deeply held, and no matter — even if they’re religiously based — as a grounds to discriminate,” Lustberg says. “Religion shouldn’t be about violating the law.”

Well they won…The Methodist organization that owns the land argued that it was their property and their rights to adhere to their own religious beliefs, but to no avail. The couple’s lawyer argued

the pavilion is open to everyone — and therefore the group could no more refuse to accommodate the lesbians than a restaurant owner could refuse to serve a black man. That argument carried the day. The state revoked the organization’s tax exemption for the pavilion area. Hoffman figures they will lose $20,000.

However, help arrived in the form of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a Christian legal firm, who plan to take it to the state court.

I have a feeling that is just the beginning of what will be more government action of extreme intolerance and endorsed persecution on religious beliefs in the name of tolerance and equality.

“And that potentially affects every religious organization in America, not just Christian organizations, but every religious organization. And I get calls from Jewish rabbis who are equally concerned — people from across the spectrum who think it’s a battle worth fighting. And we agree,” Hoffman says.

There Are 3 Responses So Far. »

  1. “Well they won…The Methodist organization that owns the land argued that it was their property and their rights to adhere to their own religious beliefs.”

    That argument is slowly being eroded on many levels - Kelo v Ct. being one very public example of the state trampling on private property rights. OSHA & EPA are used to hammer citizens with other examples of gub’mint intrusion & oppression at the expense of property rights.

    The courts seal the deal with anybody who has the big bucks & a parasite, uh, I mean, lawyer to shop their pathetic, self-absorbed cause before a sympathetic judge or jury to financially cripple any who dare oppose the mantra of ‘tolerance’ - even tolerance for perversion, stupidity or public hazard.

    Woe unto this nation for it’s foolishness.

  2. More Crap!
    What Planet am I on? Or am I in a wacky Sit-Com?

    Great Post!
    Ed

  3. It’s America and Rome is burning, son!

Post a Response